Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (February 2002, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 11 Feb 2002 17:33:12 -0500
Reply-To:     David Beierl <dbeierl@ATTGLOBAL.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         David Beierl <dbeierl@ATTGLOBAL.NET>
Subject:      Re: 2nd O2 Sensor in Cat?
Comments: To: Jay L Snyder <Jay.L.Snyder@USA.DUPONT.COM>
In-Reply-To:  <OFFEDDC196.858063B0-ON85256B5D.00727402@lvs.dupont.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

At 03:59 PM 2/11/2002, Jay L Snyder wrote: >I have one of the Bus Depot catalytic converters that has the hole for an >O2 sensor (it comes witha threaded plug). I have thought of installing a >second O2 sensor in there for diagnostic purposes.

Should not be necessary -- see below. Also, unless you install a heated sensor like the 2.1s have you may find it doesn't run hot enough to give readings at idle.

>and read the voltage output as you are driving. I have done this with the >stock one, but you get steadier readings with it disconnected from the ECU

The reason being that when the sensor is connected to the ECU, said ECU actively controls the mixture to run rich-lean-rich-lean-rich. If the ECU is doing this, your second lambda sensor ought to be giving the same fluctuating readings as the first one. Those fluctuations themselves are your indication that the system is working properly. The changes are too fast for a typical voltmeter to measure accurately, so you'll get readings all over the map above and below half a volt. If you put a 'scope on the sensor (using a x10 probe to get 10 megohm input impedance) you'll see a rough square wave btw about 0.2 and 0.8 volts as the ECU drives the mixture rich then lean then rich again.

That being said, a second sensor could be used to discover that the original sensor is bad...seems an expensive way to do it. Most things that kill the first sensor will likely kill the second one too (lead, acetic acid etc).

david

>and that kind of defeats the purpose. Anyone already done this?

-- David Beierl - Providence, RI http://pws.prserv.net/synergy/Vanagon/ '84 Westy "Dutiful Passage" '85 GL "Poor Relation"


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.