Date:         Sat, 16 Feb 2002 15:58:05 -0500
Reply-To:     "Barry E. Muller" <bmuller@UOFT02.UTOLEDO.EDU>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         "Barry E. Muller" <bmuller@UOFT02.UTOLEDO.EDU>
Organization: Home
Subject:      WBX reliability - is it held in low regard in Europe?
Content-type: text/plain; x-mac-creator=4D4F5353; x-mac-type=54455854;
              charset=us-ascii

Does anyone on the list know if the WBX is held in low regard in Europe
(Germany)?  If it isn't then what is the difference?  Better maintenance?
Just curious because I'm new to this and was wondering if there is a
reason for all the reported problems with this engine on this side of the
pond, or if it is just truly a poor design (which I doubt).  Of course,
perhaps the answer lies in the fact that the new S. African Vanagons are
all (?) sold with the inline engines.

The bottom line is I like the Vanagon and bus styles, but need something
that isn't likely to leave the family stranded by the side of the road.
If there is a maintenance regime that will keep the water boxer reliable
(and maybe even improve the mileage), then I sure want to know about it.
If I can only expect average reliability and better mileage from an engine
swap, then so be it.

bem