Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (March 2002, week 1)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 7 Mar 2002 08:43:21 -0800
Reply-To:     phil stanhope <napszeerf@YAHOO.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         phil stanhope <napszeerf@YAHOO.COM>
Subject:      Re: CA Smog Legal Conversions/Facts
In-Reply-To:  <000001c1c5a2$bc4e33a0$c00fb38e@bc.hsia.telus.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

--- Eric Unrau wrote: > All this talk about engine conversions got me > wondering about the > engines used in the current SA bus models. > they be the perfect > fit?

YESSS...YOU ARE CORRECT SIR!! Eric, those SA engines ARE a perfect fit and ARE avaliable in the USA,(for a price$$$) Ive got one, its an in-line four, we call it a "Tiico" go to this site and youll see the details.

http://www.tiico.com/

Phil 84' Westy Tiico "Millenium Falcon" 60' Morris Mini rally car1340CC 84' Westfalia Wolfsburg edition--FOR SALE-FOR SALE-SE VENDE!!!!!!(Florida) AC, PS, 4spd. Super clean interior, Captains chairs, Rare removeable center bench seat for 6 passenger capability. Body has some rusty seams Rolling Chassis-(Has NO engine)-Perfect for a conversion project!!! Tiico? Subaru?

> -----Original Message----- > From: Vanagon Mailing List > [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf > Of Frank Grunthaner > Sent: March 5, 2002 8:51 PM > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Subject: CA Smog Legal Conversions/Facts > > There is a surprising amount of blither generated on > the list in > response to > this reasonable query. I thought I would put out my > obviously > unprejudiced > thoughts. Let us summarize the question as "What can > I put in the rear > of the > Vanagon to provide alternative motive force while > remaining registrable > in > the State of California without serious punitive > costs or confiscation". > The > list of powerplant possibilities is limited but not > negligible: > > 1. The first to come to mind would be the Kennedy > sponsored Subaru 2.2L > OBD1 > engine. Details and costs are well covered on the > subaruvanagon list, > and the > pros and cons have been discussed, seldom blemished > by facts, in the > archives > of this list. > > 2. Other Subaru derivatives such as the 2.5 L OBD2 > engine, the 6 > cylinder > alternatives and several turbocharged units. The > requirement is that the > engine installed be previously sold and certified > within the USA; it be > of > the same year or newer than the chassis in which the > unit is installed; > that > all emissions components be present as were > originally installed and > that the > functioning engine meet the emissions performance of > the original > certified > vehicle. Obviously there is another corollary to > this comment regarding > engines older than the chassis, but compliance is > probably beyond the > financial resources of anyone asking this question. > In the same vane, > installing an ODB2 engine into the Vanagon will be a > real challenge for > the > backyard (or garage) amateur. In each of these > cases, the Kennedy CARB > exemption will not apply, and the final conversion > will have to go to > the > referee. (See the GD Archives for details). > > 3. The VW I-4 engines. These are installed largely > using components from > the > Vanagon Diesel. Of these, the best (IMHO) are the 8V > non-crossflow units > as > they will fit without impact to the engine cover and > the interior. The > best > of these is the Audi 3A 2.0L engine (88-92) > installed with either its > CIS-E > engine and fuel management or conversion to the > digifant II injection > system. > I've always considered the CIS system a PITA to > route, and a mechanical > kluge > as well. I believe the 3A intake will install with > no body bashing, but > I > won't be certain for several weeks. The second best > version is the 1.8L > 8V > Digifant engine (88-92), preferably with the Audi 3A > exhaust manifold. > The > fuel system is far simpler than the CIS group. The > last of these would > be the > 1.8L 8V CIS engines for reasons cited above. The > requirement is that the > engine installed be previously sold and certified > within the USA; it be > of > the same year or newer than the chassis in which the > unit is installed; > that > all emissions components be present as were > originally installed and > that the > functioning engine meet the emissions performance of > the original > certified > vehicle. In each of these cases, the final > conversion will have to go to > the > referee. (See the GD Archives for details). > > 4. Another approach involves the 2.0L 8V VW ABA (93 > on) engine. This > unit > requires a Kennedy adapter to mount it in its > orientation and will > require a > fabricated addition to the engine cover, etc, etc. I > find the engine > pricey > but affordable, and the engine cover mods > distasteful The requirement is > that > the engine installed be previously sold and > certified within the USA; it > be > of the same year or newer than the chassis in which > the unit is > installed; > that all emissions components be present as were > originally installed > and > that the functioning engine meet the emissions > performance of the > original > certified vehicle. In each of these cases, the final > conversion will > have to > go to the referee. (See the GD Archives for > details). > > 5). The VW 1.8T engine. Big pushup, requires Kennedy > adapter, engine > cover > changes, probably is OBD2 and will trash any Vanagon > transmission in > short > order. The requirement is that the engine installed > be previously sold > and > certified within the USA; it be of the same year or > newer than the > chassis in > which the unit is installed; that all emissions > components be present as > were > originally installed and that the functioning engine > meet the emissions > performance of the original certified vehicle. In > each of these cases, > the > final conversion will have to go to the referee. > (See the GD Archives > for > details). > > 6). The VW VR6. Same comments as 5 above. > > 7). The VW/Audi I-5 engine. Reputedly hardy, long > will probably have to > work > with Vanagon Projekt. Only CIS fuel management. I > don't recommend it. > Other > comments as per 5. > > 8). Porsche variants, Mazda rotaries, Mazda I-4's, > V6's, GM and Ford > === message truncated ===

__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email! http://mail.yahoo.com/


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.