Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (March 2002, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 11 Mar 2002 16:52:49 -0500
Reply-To:     "G. Matthew Bulley" <gmbulley@BULLEY-HEWLETT.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         "G. Matthew Bulley" <gmbulley@BULLEY-HEWLETT.COM>
Organization: Bulley-Hewlett
Subject:      Re: Loss of power at altitude
In-Reply-To:  <50750ECDD09ED411AF9A00508B6A823B7C0775@harp.interval.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Beyond the loss of O2 (which isn't the chief issue for loss of power described), you also significantly loose the amount of atmosphere stacked on top of you when you go up a mountain.

It is the weight of the atmosphere that pushes the air into the cylinders on a non-super-charged engine, and the atmosphere at higher altitudes has much less weight than sea-level. I know this can be confusing, because we always think of the piston "sucking" air in... it *really* isn't, though.

It is merely getting out of the way, and whatever weight of atmosphere is available at that place will do its best to rush through the air filter, past the throttle, and into the place where the piston was moments prior. Again... it took me a little think time to digest this, but it is the root.

Boosting fuel will only take you outside the stoichiometric ratio, since there isn't enough air coming in to match it. The only (sorta) solution is to supercharge, either with an exhaust-driven charger, or a mechanical-driven charger...

Lurking, and popping up on the Vanagon list since 1997,

G. Matthew Bulley Bulley-Hewlett Corporate Communications Business: www.bulley-hewlett.com Alliance: www.ntara.com Call tollfree: +1.877.658.1278

-----Original Message----- From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM] On Behalf Of Aaron Reams Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 3:00 PM To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM Subject: Re: Loss of power at altitude

Yeah, that makes sense... but the loss of power was very significant. For example, the loss of power in other vehicles like my jeep is negligible if even noticeable for the same drive.

Note: On a gradual incline at altitude I was in second gear and slowing (< 23 mph). At sea level on the same incline I could easily accelerate in 3rd and probably maintain in 4th (> 40mph).

Thanks for the response!

Aaron

>Nope you got less oxygen and so less power at altitude. I forget the exact >figures but you lose a bunch of HP at 8000 feet.


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.