Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (March 2002, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 12 Mar 2002 07:39:28 -0800
Reply-To:     Dana Morphew <kadm@PUGETSOUND.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Dana Morphew <kadm@PUGETSOUND.NET>
Organization: Dana's Mobile Carpet Steam
Subject:      Re: Capacity?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Here's a tidbit on the subject:

GL4 vs GL5 from pennzoil's site:

What happens if API GL-5 gear oil is used in an API GL-4 gear oil application?

API GL-4 and API GL-5 products typically use the same extreme pressure (EP) additive system, with the API GL-5 having about twice the concentration of a API GL-4. In service, these additives become active under extreme load and temperature when the protective oil film can be squeezed away. EP additives work by forming wear-resistant compounds with the metal of the gear tooth surface. As the gears mesh, these compounds shield the gear teeth from direct metal-to-metal contact that would cause wear and damage to the gears. If too little of the active additive is present, proper protection would be compromised. Too much of this additive could cause excessive chemical corrosion of the gear surface. If an API GL-5 gear oil is used in a application where API GL-4 gear oil is called for, chemical corrosion of "yellow metal" components may occur, such as bronze synchronizers, brass bushings, etc. This may lead to shifting difficulties or shortened equipment life.

-Dana-

> > Yeah, agreed, we've talked about this alot. What I read most recently was > that GL-5 had some component (sulfur, I think?) that ate synchros about 50% > faster than GL-4. Is this true, and is it true of GL-5 synthetic as well? > Hmmm.... > bmc :) > "Faith will move mountains, but you'd better bring a shovel...." > > This thread keeps coming up. GL-5 is a higher performance standard than > > GL-4. The concern is not that GL-5 is more corrosive, but may keep the > > syncros from working properly due to the higher extreme pressure > > capabilities. Since bearing failure and Ring/Pinion failure are both > > common and expensive, I myself use the GL-5 synthetic oils. Syncros are > > cheap compared to those items. > > > > Dennis > >

> > quarts for the syncro. Both call for GL-4, not GL-5. In the syncro > > tranny, > > GL-5 eats the synchronizers, does anyone know if that's true on the 2WD > > as > > well? > > tx, > > bmc :)


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.