>I think you miss my point. A type 1 aircooled in a Beetle would go for >this sort of distance too, (my 74 has done 300,000km which is 180,000 >miles and is still going fine). My point was that if you put that same >engine into a Van it doesn't last well at all. I'm concerned that we >don't really know how well the I4s or Subarus are going to go in an >application for which they were never intended. It's promising that >there is one report of an I4 doing 100,000, but for me at least, the >jury is still out until I hear some more evidence of these engines doing >well in the long term. The Subaru engines in question are not small low-powered engines. They also rev high and are designed to do so all day utterly reliably; treat a low-revving US V8 or Bug engine, with their primitive metallurgy, this way and it'll soon blow. -- Andrew Grebneff 165 Evans St, Dunedin 9001, New Zealand <andrew.grebneff@stonebow.otago.ac.nz> Seashell, Macintosh, VW/Toyota van nut |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.