Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (March 2002, week 4)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 28 Mar 2002 15:42:12 -0700
Reply-To:     Blake Thornton <thornton@MATH.UTAH.EDU>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Blake Thornton <thornton@MATH.UTAH.EDU>
Subject:      Re: CARB Certification
In-Reply-To:  <47.1a928ccc.29d4f13f@aol.com>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Yes, this really is crazy, but most legislation has some rational thinking behind it even if it leads to crazy results (like this one).

So, why would they not just require you at least match emission standards for the vehicle (meaning the body of the vehicle I suppose). The only reasons I can come up with are:

- Car manufacturers want to sell more cars.

- (I can't quite get this one phrased right) a fear that people will obtain "new" cars that easily meet old emmission standards by putting new engines in old cars - cars that many people might think should be discarded.

It makes me wonder about the people importing new mexican beetles to the US. There is (or was) a company who would sell you a brand new old style beetle from mexico, but the problem is that this car doesn't meet the US's collision ratings (and other ratings). I think this is part of the problem of importing a vanagon from South africa? Anyway, the way the beetle guys get around it is you drive to mexico in your 1975 Bug (a US car). Once there, a new mexican beetle is purchased and parts are exchanged and a few days later you drive back to the US with a completely new car put on the chasis of your old beetle (does this sound right to those of you who have looked into it?)

I suppose that these cars would not pass the CARB test.

blake

> Wow, what a mess, I had no idea. Doesn't it make more sense to measure what > comes out of the exhaust? I would bet that converting a vanagon to electric > 'zero emission' wouldn't jibe either -- non original engine. I do know that > Peter at Tiico has been fighting this stuff for a while, just never knew what > it was. I, like everyone else, want clean air. This just sounds ridiculous. > Some day, we'll use hydrogen.....then comes the subaru hydrogen fuel-cell > swap, Lilley oxygen upgrades, etc..... > > Thanks to all who responded. Especially Scot and Sean who kept it under the > prescribed "150 words or less". > > Bill Marshall > 85 GL Tiico with low emissions > Phoenix AZ >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.