Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (March 2002, week 5)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 29 Mar 2002 03:13:57 -0800
Reply-To:     Cary Chiang <cchiang1@YAHOO.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Cary Chiang <cchiang1@YAHOO.COM>
Subject:      Comment on 2.1 WBx vs. 2.2 Sub vs. Tiico (was The problem with
              TIICO)  <F>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

"The undocumented Subaru 2.2L is clearly an appropriate choice for conversion. Its torque curve would appear to be that of a typical small displacement engine, i.e., tuned for output at higher rpm. The Subaru conversion will not be competitive with the 2.1L WBx off the line and in low rpm situations (especially if mated to the 2.1L transaxle). It will probably outperform the WBx at higher rpms and clearly has an extended usable rev range."

Dear Frank:

It's nice to see you dispariging Subies differently in this post (nothing about them being "ashamed" of their performance by not publishing HP and torque curves). My Subie 2.2 "feels" stronger down low than the Tiico I drove, although I agree that one cannot count on "seat of the pants" impressions. Since we have no published data to prove otherwise, are you willing to concede that it is at least *possible* that the Subie 2.2 has at LEAST as much torque as a VW 2.1 WB "down low", while having more torque at the higher RPMs also? Even if this is not so, say for example the Subie's torque did not exceed the VW WB's until 3000 RPM, how much time does one actually spend revving thru that lower RPM range, anyway?

Finally, I am shocked (shocked!) that you would stray from your normally fact-based comments, and delve into supposition (using the terms "appear" and "probably"), while at the same time making "fact"-like statements ("will not be competitive") that you clearly cannot PROVE without data! Please, either stick to your normal scientific analysis, or give half-baked opinions like many others do, but not BOTH at the same time!

Cary

--------------------------------- Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Greetings - send greetings for Easter, Passover


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.