Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (April 2002, week 1)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 1 Apr 2002 20:35:43 -0800
Reply-To:     Todd Last <Rubatoguy@MINDSPRING.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Todd Last <Rubatoguy@MINDSPRING.COM>
Subject:      Re: Any one activated rear fog in back light cluster?
Comments: To: Robert Steven Fish <fish@SALZBURG.CO.AT>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

I think the idea is that in FOG you need a bright light to be seen. A regular tail-light wattage bulb won't do.. I've seen Volvos with their rear foglights operating, and it looks the same as the brake-light in brightness - and yes it is annoying when it is not foggy.

In any case, I have both an American and European rear light. The European has an installed reflector and a different pattern on the lense that has the fog light. A number of the lenses have different patterns. The turn signal for example.

Todd '88 Westy

Robert Steven Fish wrote:

>snipped--------- >The position in the USA spec light cluster for the fog has a reflector lens >on the outside, and I don't think the concave bulb reflector on the inside >is mirrored. Put a bulb behind it and the result is scattered all over, >end sniped-------------- > >I think that is actually the point of these rear "fog lights". Unless you >are planning on driving quite a bit in reverse, in foggy weather, you really >do not want or need any sort of a "beam" back there. > >If there were to be a reflector, and higher wattage than the 21 watt OEM >lamp, they my assumption is that it would be highly unsafe and incourteous >to those driving behind you. > >I have both "converted" to the Europe specification, and they are just what >tha doctor ordered... a nice solid red "glow" for those ultra foggy >conditions, when folks just can't see the car in front of them. > >Or am I missing something in your master plan?? > > ><º)))>{ <º)))>{ <º)))>{ <º)))>{ <º)))>{ <º)))>{ > >Robert S. Fish >Salzburg, Austria >1987 Wolfsburg Vanagon 2.1 GL Weekender >1987 Golf Cabriolet >1991 Golf >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.