Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (April 2002, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 8 Apr 2002 17:45:51 -0500
Reply-To:     Stan Wilder <wilden1@JUNO.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Stan Wilder <wilden1@JUNO.COM>
Subject:      Re: Vanagon crash safety
Comments: To: jbrush@AROS.NET
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

In all of my roughing it camping trips I never see any SUVs out in the rough or off a paved road. I see a few Vanagons and Bays that use the cow trails or fire breaks to get to remote destinations. I can't argue about a frontal assault with a giant Ford Exposition (7000) pounds but I'm pretty confident that I'm doing as good as all the Toyota, Subaru, Nissan etc. ect passenger vehicles. I mention the SUVs because I see a lot of rollovers on the Interstate Highways, its always too much speed at the heart of the wreck. I'd hesitate to do much off roading in an SUV designed to give a smooth ride on city streets. My last four wheel drive was a 1975 Toyota Land Cruiser, the made for war version that would rattle your teeth, make you curse the fuel mileage but I pulled a many CJ5 or CJ7 out of the mud with it. I had it up on two wheels several times and it wasn't a pleasant memory. I often wonder who has the absolutely worst test results in crash tests. I've never seen full sized pickups tested. As a matter of fact almost every current test is done on luxury automobiles, MPVs and SUVs. They just sort of skip the generic models.

Stan Wilder 83 Westfalia Air Cooled

On Mon, 8 Apr 2002 15:58:58 -0600 John Brush <jbrush@AROS.NET> writes: > >You don't have to believe in pillows and springs and socialism to > know > >that the Vanagon is not very safe in a frontal collision. > > The only thing that would be of value is hard data, and I haven't > seen any > yet. Anything other than that is pure conjecture. There are many > vehicles > that a Vanagon would run right over the top of, so there is no way > the > above statement has any merit. > > It certainly looks to be unsafe, but then so does a vanagong going > around > a corner, but in truth, its pretty stable. SUVs look safe, but we > have > learned that they are not. Looks can be, and usually are, > deceiving. > > >It's all about mass. The Vanagon has precious little where it > counts. > > Its all about guessing what will happen, but not really knowing. > > John >

________________________________________________________________ GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.