Date:         Tue, 16 Apr 2002 07:52:41 -0600
Reply-To:     Ben McCafferty <ben@KBMC.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Ben McCafferty <ben@KBMC.NET>
Subject:      Re: cubic cubic centimeters WAS: Re: This is not the forum...
Comments: To: Karl Wolz <wolzphoto@worldnet.att.net>
In-Reply-To:  <002301c1e4e7$92d81ea0$d857530c@pavilion>
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

I've been outgeeked!!  :)
bmc  :)
"Faith will move mountains, but you'd better bring a shovel...."


> From: "Karl Wolz" <wolzphoto@worldnet.att.net>
> Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 18:39:35 -0700
> To: "Ben McCafferty" <ben@KBMC.NET>, <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM>
> Subject: Re:      cubic cubic centimeters WAS: Re: This is not the forum...
>
> As I understand it, a cubic cc is expressed in terms of the fourth
> dimension, which would be time.  At $1 per cubic cc, time is indeed money!
>
> Karl Wolz
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ben McCafferty" <ben@KBMC.NET>
> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM>
> Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 4:16 PM
> Subject: cubic cubic centimeters WAS: Re: This is not the forum...
>
>
>> Now, the question is:  is a cubic cc 9 times the size of a normal cc?  Or
> 27
>> times?  If so, maybe we've finally solved the underpowered Vanagon
>> problem....  :)
>> bmc  :)
>> "Faith will move mountains, but you'd better bring a shovel...."
>>
>>> OW!  MY TOES!
>>>
>>> Now about the engine... I give you the hypocrite-special... $1 per cubic
> cc.
>>> Your choice!
>>>
>
>
>