Date:         Tue, 23 Apr 2002 02:00:37 EDT
Reply-To:     Sibleyjm@AOL.COM
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Jeff Sibley <Sibleyjm@AOL.COM>
Subject:      Re: The Better Waterboxer Motor....the simpler 1.9L or the 2.1L
              with all ofth...
Comments: To: TSmola@TRIBUNE.COM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

In a message dated 4/22/02 10:56:07 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
TSmola@TRIBUNE.COM writes:


> It seems that the 1.9L motor. with 82 bhp , while less powerful than the
> 2.1L w/  95 bhp.....is alot less complicated with coolant hoses, failure
> prone waterpumps and thermostats......

you with your 1.9 banger....obviously don't understand the "incredible, mind
blowing, powerful, g-forced" rush of driving a floored 2.1 litre
boxer,........ uphill. ;)

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!

Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com

The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.