Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (April 2002, week 4)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sat, 27 Apr 2002 23:12:55 -0500
Reply-To:     Chris Stann <ChrisS@INFORMS.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Chris Stann <ChrisS@INFORMS.COM>
Subject:      Re: 1.9L exhaust system comments
Comments: To: SpaceKommander <jboldway@BEE.NET>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

> Ok, while on technical subjects - onward to the wizardry of VW water cooled > boxer engines. I'm on a roll now . . . heregoes . . . You have an aluminum > alloy block with water jackets which go up to the head on the outer > periphery of the head. Inside you have two steel cylinder barrels that mate > up with the middle areas of the heads. Eight LONG bolts attach the head to > the crankcase. This is truly evil. Steel and aluminum expand at different > rates - so in the heating/cooling thermal pattern of engine operation the > head gaskets see non-uniform pressures on them - essentially the head > gaskets are forced to expand and contract. This should not be happening. > So, my two cents says that head bolt torque is vitally important to engine > head gasket life.

I've always felt that periodical retorquing of the heads would lessen the chances of a head-gasket blow-out for the reasons you mentioned above. Also, changing the head gaskets every few years since old rubber gets less flexible and isn't able to keep the seal tight during the expansion/contraction cycle of the engine.

> Anyway. What's this talk of inferior and weak & flexy crankshafts? Due to > many reasons - flow restrictions and ECU cutoff - the engine won't rev past > 5,500 RPM anyway - and I've never heard watercooled VW engines having a > common failure of throwing a rod or breaking a crankshaft or wearing out > the main bearings due to "crankshaft flex." I think the lower end is almost > bulletproof. I have over 200,000 miles on my 1.9L and usually rev it up > near 5,000 RPM before each shift - and the previous owner did same and > cruised the highways of Kansas for hours at 4,500 RPM. Kansas isn't a small > state. 4 hours each weekend at 4,500 RPM should rule out any "crank flex" > problems. OK, if you are some yahoo with Dellorto 42 IDAs and open headers > trying to turn 7,500 RPM then maybe you have a valid point.

Crank flex is much more common in the air-cooled cases which are made from softer materials. That's why it's not unusual to have to align-bore them after 60000 miles. I could see how worn main bearings, quite possibly due to lackluster maintenance, can contribute to excessive clearances and eventual ovaling of the main bearing seats.


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.