Date:         Thu, 9 May 2002 23:25:37 +1200
Reply-To:     Andrew Grebneff <andrew.grebneff@STONEBOW.OTAGO.AC.NZ>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Andrew Grebneff <andrew.grebneff@STONEBOW.OTAGO.AC.NZ>
Subject:      Re: A Subaru that's not PERFECT?
In-Reply-To:  <149.e355676.2a0b59d3@aol.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"

>In a message dated 5/8/02 9:15:19 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
>freeholder@STARBAND.NET writes:
>
>
>>  Hey, I test drove a Forester.  What a piece of junk.  The engine might be
>>  wonderful and last
>>  forever, but the rest of the car was cheesy.  I've seen thicker plastic
>>  wrapped around a fast
>>  food sandwich.
>>
>
>were all entitled to an opinion, and, having owned two subarus and SEVERAL
>other makes and models, I know for a fact, YOUR OPINION SUCKS!  fact...,


Well said. Not a bad vehicle; it's a modified Impreza. But it's not a
serious offroader and wasn't designed as such. It's what the Aussies
call a "soft-roader." And it's UGLY.

>VANAGON SYNCRO, everybody knows there is no logical comparison to this...

Sure there is... several Japanese manufacturers make them.
--
Andrew Grebneff
165 Evans St, Dunedin 9001, New Zealand
<andrew.grebneff@stonebow.otago.ac.nz>
Seashell, Macintosh, VW/Toyota van nut