Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (June 2002, week 5)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sat, 29 Jun 2002 17:59:41 -0700
Reply-To:     mike ingle <mikei@ANCORE.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         mike ingle <mikei@ANCORE.COM>
Subject:      Re: Speedo Calibration
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Thanks, Can't believe I left out the pi * diameter part. oh well. And, I agree after thinking it through that in fact 2* the rolling raduis (center to pavement) is more accurate. Also well aware that the significant figures are way overstated here, but I always keep precision where I have it, to reduce total error.

The corrected factor becomes:

engine rev (rpm) * transaxle ratio * rolling radius (inches) * 2 * pi * 946.9697 * 10^-6 = miles per hour. engine rev (rpm) * transaxle ratio * rolling radius (inches) * 5.95e-3 = miles per hour.

test: 3200 rpm, 1.0 ratio, 14"

266mph.

for an 091 acw transmission: http://volksweb.relitech.com/helmut/GEARBOX.HTM 3.78 1st gear => 0.05477 ratio 2.06 2nd gear => 0.1005 1.23 3rd gear => 0.1683 0.85 4th gear => 0.2436 the above derived using the given 4.83 transaxle ratio The only way that these numbers make sense is as final drive reduction,

thus a realistic ratio for 4th gear of 0.2436 gives 64.8mph. Much more like it

Mike ----- Original Message ----- From: <FrankGRUN@aol.com> To: <mikei@ANCORE.COM>; <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2002 5:14 PM Subject: Re: Speedo Calibration

In a message dated 6/29/02 3:59:17 PM, mikei@ANCORE.COM writes:

<< Converion:

engine rev/min * 60 min/hr * transaxle ratio = wheel rev/hour

now,

measure your tires from side to side (to eliminate the little flat spot you

rest on) in inches.

wheel width in inches * 1 ft/12in * 1mi/5280ft = miles / wheel revolution

now,

multiply wheel rev/hr * miles/wheel rev to get miles/hr

simplified : engine rev (rpm) * transaxle ratio * wheel dia (inches) *

946.9697 * 10^-6 = miles per hour. >>

Mike,

Nice arithmetic, bad function, incorrect result. First, C=ÿd=3.1416*d. Second, measurement of static tire diameter is irrevelant. The rolling diameter (as in 2*rolling radius) establishes the true dimensions of the tire. This number is always smaller than the apparent diameter because of inflation vs. load, tire flexure and tread compliance. For new tires, this number is given for a specified inflation pressure and load. For example, 805 revs/mile. Now work backwards through the gear train to get the distance traveled of the wheel as a function of engine speed.

For measurement of the revs/mile for older tires use the chalk mark on the sidewall method and measure away. Unfortunately the accuracy will not be better than 2 significant figures.

Frank Grunthaner


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.