Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (August 2002, week 3)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 20 Aug 2002 03:25:39 +0100
Reply-To:     Clive Smith <clive.harman-smith@NTLWORLD.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Clive Smith <clive.harman-smith@NTLWORLD.COM>
Subject:      Re: swing away tire carrier
Comments: To: Gary Lee <gary2a@TELUSPLANET.NET>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

This seems good reasoning to me. Don't want incipient stresses fatiguing body panels into cracks after n000 miles. VW would have likely even looked at actual relative strains - that is calculated them - dats what engineers do.

Clive

----- Original Message ----- From: "Gary Lee" <gary2a@TELUSPLANET.NET> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 1:39 AM Subject: Re: swing away tire carrier

> Bill, > It certainly would be a lot easier to build the latch on the door, like the > Ortec. The OEM VW carrier has the latch attached in the same place as where > I did mine. Here's why I did it that way, and why I speculate VW did as > well. The VW carrier is clamped tightly at the latch, as is mine, for > strength. A rigid connection designed to restrict movement in two planes. I > expect that there is a certain amount of flexing/twisting in the body shell, > so there is a small amount of movement between the vertical and horizontal > door jams. However, I would expect that there is more movement between the > vertical door jamb and the actual door. To this end it is better to have > all attachment points on the same structure, either the door alone or body > alone. > Does this make sense? Let me know what you think. > > Gary > http://www.telusplanet.net/public/gary2a/rack/vanagonrack.htm > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bill Kasper" <dragonlist@ipmts.ucsc.edu> > To: "Gary Lee" <gary2a@telusplanet.net> > Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 3:54 PM > Subject: Re: swing away tire carrier > > > > no worries, you've done a great thing. one other thought i had was to > > do the latching in the beauty strip on the door rather than next to the > > light. there's quite a lot of splash down there during rains, and > > unless the drilling was sealed up really well it might rust faster than > > a bolted plate to the beauty strip on the hatch; also easier to replace > > a hatch than that piece of sheetmetal between the license hatch and the > > tail light, i would think. > > > > keep up the outstanding work. i don't know if i would buy one (i have > > a custom underfront carrier for my tire which works fine), but i know > > many, many syncro owners who have been looking. keep us apprised. > > > > best, > > bill >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.