Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (August 2002, week 4)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 22 Aug 2002 19:50:32 -0400
Reply-To:     80 Westy Pokey <pokey@VANAGON.ORG>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         80 Westy Pokey <pokey@VANAGON.ORG>
Subject:      Re: Custom Scoop Update - Should you care! FISH Y
Comments: To: Clive Smith <clive.harman-smith@NTLWORLD.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

OK, so how do I create low pressure in the engine

compartment so that more air flows in? Someone must know

what the intended engineering airflow was supposed to be in

our vans.

Thanks, Chris

---- Original message ---- >Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 00:23:56 +0100 >From: Clive Smith <clive.harman-smith@NTLWORLD.COM>

>Subject: Re: Custom Scoop Update - Should you care! FISH Y

>To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > >Scoops do not pull in air >Aerodynamics, especially guessaerodynamics is not a black

and white subject >(my normal rant). >F1 aerodynamicists are at the top of the tree for this

reason - with 3D >objects moving close to a ground plane it gets even more

complex. >So for someone to think they know exactly whats going on

without a lot of >empirical back-up (exhaustive real size testing and instrumentation) is just >wishful thinking - even today, its not an exact science -

though its getting >pretty good with computational fluid dynamics (that were

one of the driving >forces behind the development of supercomputers - if that

gives you an idea >of whatyou're asking! > >Anyway, I'm having to pick and choose exactly what you're

asking, as that is >so vague... >.. you want of know if air gfoes into an input hole (flush

or scoop) and if >so, wahat sort of flow rate. > >If you really have read all the back mails on this subject

then you'll know >something already - as I and others have waxed technical

more than once, >although I must say, and admit, that most has been to

DISPEL incorrect ideas >ans statements, rather than to state SPECIFICS - for the

reasons outlined >above. > >.. but if you have read ALL previous you'll know this -

UNLESS THE EXIT VENT >IS AT A LOWER PRESSURE THAN THE INLET THEN THE FLOW RATE

WILL BE COMPROMISED >OR NEGATED. > >Also, I wouldn't go directing fresh air over just cylinder

#3 - a bad idea >for simple reasons. > >The boundary layer on a Spitfire wings at 400mph is about

an inch thick >(meaning that the velocity 1" away from the surface is still only 99% of >that of the full stream velocity). It is unlikely to be

more than about 1/4" >thick at the back of your van at 60mph so even a splitter

plate 1" away >SHOULD allow plenty of full stream air to flow in -

PROVIDED their isn't a >big separation bubble sitting just in front of the intake,

PROVIDED the >total cross sectional area of the duct entrance is matched

to the duct >itself, PROVIDED the sink at the other end of the duct can

handle the flow >volume and PROVIDED the sink (exhaust) pressure at that

flow rate is >significantly lower than atmospheric (but I'm not prepared

to say how much!) >and no doubt provided a few OTHER things as well. >

>Experimentation with a grasp of fundamental principles, an

open mind and >devise instrumentation to prove the case - e.g. smoke flow,

tufting etc. are >cheap. > >Technicians know what they know >Engineers know what they don't know > >If you have studied your subject to such an extent that you

know areas of >knowledge exist, but maybe you don't know their specifics,

that is quite a >powerful situation to be in - much better than when you

don't know whats >round that big blind knowledge corner - or even that the

blind corner >exists! >Put simpler - a little knowledge can be a dangerous thing. > >Hope this helps a bit more (but something makes me think

I'm going to regret >responding - again) > >Clive >'88 Syncro Transporter > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Robert Steven Fish" <fish@SALZBURG.CO.AT> >To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> >Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 11:50 PM >Subject: Re: Custom Scoop Update - Should you care! > > >> A List Member asked whether these air vents actually do

suck in air, or >vent >> out air. I am still not certain that anyone has answered

this clearly. >> >> I have followed this thread with interest, as I live in

Austria now, and >was >> forced to remove my rear side running lights. As these

are now gone, >there >> is a nice large space, especially on the driver's side,

where a cutout >could >> be made and a scoop could be constructed to pull air in

while driving... >it >> could even be directed pretty much directly onto cylinder

#3 if the design >> was good. >> >> Before I consider this for the left or right or both

sides... it would be >> good to know what really happens to the air as one

drives. If you create >> airflow using scoops (and if it even works at all, is

another question) >> where does the resulting flow end up going... and does it

result in bad >> things, like creating backflow or vacuum areas anywhere. >> >> How far out must one actually go, to obtain a

successful "scoop" effect? >> Would an inch end up pulling any air in??

>> >> Aerodynamics experts on the list... PLEASE set us all

straight on this >> mess... and deliver the final word, so we all can get on

with our lives. >> >> RSF >> >> IMPORTANT!!! In order to reply to me, you must have the

word "FISH" >> somewhere in the subject line of the email. Otherwise it

goes directly in >> the trash. >> >> <º)))>{ <º)))>{ <º)))>{ <º)))>{ <º)))>{ <º)))>{ >> >> <º)))>{ <º)))>{ <º)))>{ <º)))>{ <º)))>{ <º)))>{ >> >> Robert S. Fish >> Salzburg, Austria >> 1987 Wolfsburg Vanagon 2.1 GL Weekender >> 1987 Golf Cabriolet >> 1991 Golf >>


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.