Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (August 2002, week 4)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 23 Aug 2002 15:09:56 EDT
Reply-To:     KimBrennan@AOL.COM
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Kim Brennan <KimBrennan@AOL.COM>
Subject:      Re:       2 questions...(still 
              looking for a westy)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

In a message dated 8/23/02 2:13:05 PM, westyutah@YAHOO.COM writes:

> My first question is about air cooled vs water cooled. I am still on > the hunt for a westy and i have really appreciated all the advice I have > recieved so far. As for the air vs water, I have heard arguments in support > of each. Now as a non mechanic, i would like to know what I would be better > off buying. The main thing that I have heard about the water cooled is the > problem with the head gasket leak. Also, my budget will only allow me to > buy a westy between 1980 and maybe 1984 or 85. So even if I did get a water > cooled it would be an early one. > > The air cooled engine is (or was in the beginning) a simpler engine to understand. A good book for the non-mechanic (especially for air cooled engines) is How to keep your Volkswagen Alive, by John Muir Publications. It doesn't go into the water cooled engines.

> My next question is another conversion question. I have decided not to > pursue the subaru conversion simply because I am not a mechanic. But there > is a 1983 westy that was a diesel and has been converted to a VW Golf > gasoline engine. it has about 60k on the golf engine. Any advice on whether > or not this might be a good buy? Thanks for all the help! >

I've never owned a diesel, but again, they are a simpler design than the gas power engines. Depending on what size Golf engine was put in to the 83 Westy, this might be a very good choice. The Golf engine itself is pretty darn reliable. The size issue is mainly one of power. A 1.6 liter just isn't going to be much fun unless you have a lot of time. The 1.8 liter will move you, but you'll always be the last one in the traffic light drag races (unless the other person is in a 1.6 or diesel). The 2.0 is the way to go. Makes the Vanagon a joy to drive, even in daily driving.

On the other paw, getting a conversion and without being a mechanic means that you'll probably have difficulty getting service at a dealer. The good news is you probably won't need much service beyond filters, oil and coolant changes.


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.