Date:         Tue, 27 Aug 2002 01:50:40 EDT
Reply-To:     Wolfvan88@AOL.COM
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Robert Lilley <Wolfvan88@AOL.COM>
Subject:      Re: 2.2L EuroCars Engine vs 2.1l Boston Engine
Comments: To: bostneng@FCL-US.NET
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

<<<The main problem with going to a non stock cam iswhen you have allot more
duration this disrupts the vacuum signal and youcan't have that with fuel
injection systems and still have driveabilty.>>>

It is not true...for me at least...

My modified engine with a bigger duration cam, ratio rockers, lightened
flywheel, mildly ported heads and the Aussie Chip can go  from @1500 rpm and
back to 5000+ rpm in fourth gear (@25 mph to @75 mph,  I have one more gear
to go also...)  smooth with no vibrations...


Robert

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!

Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com

The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.