Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (August 2002, week 4)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 27 Aug 2002 08:24:59 -0400
Reply-To:     Robert Donalds <bostneng@FCL-US.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Robert Donalds <bostneng@FCL-US.NET>
Subject:      Re: 2.2L EuroCars Engine vs 2.1l Boston Engine
Comments: cc: clive.harman-smith@NTLWORLD.COM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"


Clive 
I have an oxy monitor on my dash and I can see the ECU going full rich much sooner and staying there during a aggressive driving and hard acceleration 
more fuel to make power not increased emissions but we will see I am driving to Maine this week 1 full tank of highway driving
the 2.1 engine has larger intakes and in my case larger valves so I am moving allot more air threw the engine to begin with. The 1.9 ECU is definitely a economy fuel ecu in my van I have seen 21 mpg at 75 mph  
Bob
Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!

Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com

The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.