Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (September 2002, week 1)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 3 Sep 2002 08:31:20 -0700
Reply-To:     Mark Keller <kelphoto@HIGHSPEEDPLUS.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Mark Keller <kelphoto@HIGHSPEEDPLUS.COM>
Subject:      Turbo question Water Jacket Seal failure
Comments: To: Damon Campbell <damoncampbellvw@YAHOO.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854";
              x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"

Hi Damon,

Welcome to the list. My name is Mark Keller. I've thought some about the type of responses you might get from other listmember regarding your question.. MY general feeling is that you'll be told to swap motors or get a lot of flack for wanting to turbo the water boxer engine. Let me share my views as well.

First I did an internet search on Google for the Subaru waterboxer that is turbocharged. There is nothing wrong with the basic layout being turbo charged. I could not find any issues with respect to the compression seal issue with the VW block. It seems the real issue was the exhaust pipe routing for proper pulse according to firing order of the engine to achieve a efficient spool up design. In other words, a lot of plumbing for the right setup. Drag engines I've seen, SPENCER's or SMITH VW in Tampa, Fl , had a World Record 1/8 mile dragster, 600 hp or so, that used twin turbos, but I believer the high rpm range overcame the need for pulse effect. Also this not a VW cast block, but a custom block and air-cooled, but it held together.

The other item was I saw an image from a listmember in Japan's website of a turbocharger on a Vanagon engine at one of their camp outs. The listmember goes by the name of "Yoshi". If you search the Vanagon list archives for the years 1999-2001, under his name you should be able to locate is website.

My general feeling of the effect on durability of the engine isn't negative, but there is a design issue that the waterboxer differs in than the Subaru. The VW cylinders are removable. This necessitates a thick rubber gasket only around the cooling jacket s to compensate for dissimilar metal expansion-- VW's use very long steel studs which clamp the aluminum cylinders and head assembly to the block.

This thick rubber gasket is susceptible to hardening, much like rubber tires that are overheated during racing conditions . I've read a blurb on the Michelin site that excesive heat in the rubber causes a molecular change which resulting in the desirable short molecule chain being converted to longer molecule chains and hence a effect of making the compound of a harder rubber. I forget if this was for street tires, long term high milage tire compounds and stablile compostions or racing conditions. Either way tire rubber componds are prone to harding.

Applying this molecular hardening to the rubber seal due to heat may offer some explanation to the waterboxer's high failure rate of this item. It would appear that high heat short term , overheating, or just long term normal operating temperatures would affect adversely the critical pliability of the cooling jacket seal . In my opinion other driving behavior can exacerbate the failure of this seal . I believe the VW brand coolant for this engine includes some time of additive to keep attempt to keep the exposed edge of the seal pliable or swollen. This is where coolant is forced beneath the seal and corrosion of the heads surface begins. Obviously , I don't believe anything can completely compensate for the natural hardening due to molecular change of the compound, and thus the seal expansion would degrade.

Another possibility are engines which have had several bouts of overheating for whatever reason. And possibly a general driver habit of driving for the first few minutes each day . During Cold weather or below water freezing first start and then operating the engine at 2000 RPM s or more before the temperature needle has as least begun to move and thus subjecting the thick rubber seal to the high hydraulic pressure generated by the cooling pump and a closed thermostat, and thus forcing coolant beneath and otherwise intact seal.

Therefore I believe it best to give the cylinder liners a chance to expand and have adequate clamping force on the rubber cooling jacket seal, before higher than 2000 RPMs operating, after the Temp needle moves. ON my van I wait until the needle has just begun to clear the big white mark at the bottom of the temperature gauge. But I only do this religiously on cold freezing days. Other times I just wait until the needle moves.

Back now to you turbo-ing the motor. I'd consider the effects of higher heat on the hardening of this cooling jacket seal. You could have a shorter time before needing to replace the gasket, kind of like racing tires, before it hardened up. For certain the issue is keeping your heat transfer down, moderate boost, ceramic coatings etc.

Sincerely,

Mark Keller 91 Vanagon Carat Cowichan Bay, BC


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.