never got an answer but the good news is that she passed the smog with flying colors :)) h. On Tue, 3 Sep 2002 at 10:28 -0700, I wrote: [lengthy prelude snipped] HW> Now my questions: HW> 1) what could have caused the high NO values when the old cat did not HW> "*look* broken. Obvious answer seems it is actually broken. But why then HW> would HC and CO not be off the richter too? HW> HW> 2) did I kill the new cat on the first run when it got so hot? I guess I HW> will find out after the next smog check... :) HW> HW> 3) what, if any, role could the loose spark plugs (some soot but no HW> extreme noise) have played? HW> HW> thanks so much for any input!! HW> h. HW> |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.