Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (September 2002, week 4)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 24 Sep 2002 08:59:44 -0700
Reply-To:     Sean Garrett <SEAN.GARRETT@ASU.EDU>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Sean Garrett <SEAN.GARRETT@ASU.EDU>
Subject:      Re: CA 81-83 air cooled Fuel Injection & Ignition System
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"

Not trying to flame you here, but... As another post put it, your mileage will not differ. Also as you put it, driving a brick through the air. A different ignition system is not going to make a significant difference. Save your money for a water-cooled conversion if you want to make a difference.

Sean Garrett 1981 Westy (his) 1995 Eurovan Camper (hers) sean.garrett@asu.edu

> -----Original Message----- > From: Jeff Strickrott [mailto:jstric01@cs.fiu.edu] > Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 5:08 PM > To: Sean Garrett > Cc: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Subject: Re: CA 81-83 air cooled Fuel Injection & Ignition System > > > Not a matter of having to, but wanting to try to get better > mileage (if possible > for driving a brick through the air) and to have the car run > cleaner and > automatically adjust the air/fuel mixture. > > One of the benefits is that I increase the longevity of my > new stainless steal > cat. In addition one can use the cat and exhaust from a 1.9 > on a federal system. > The benefits: > - O2 sensor port, > - and all parts available in stainless, so only the heater > boxes and crossover > pipe will deteriorate. > > Plus I guess I have too much time to think of things to do. :-) > > --Jeff > 82 Westy, South Florida > > Sean Garrett wrote: > > > You should not have to convert this to be "better" in some respects. > > My recently rebuilt 81 Fed model gets 18 mpg after a > complete rebuild and 7k > > miles on her. I took her in at 6k miles for a tune up. It > didn't need one (I > > was told). she is still breaking in but I suspect a well > maintained (or new) > > air-cooled fed model engine should only need the ignition > parts changed at > > ~6-10 k miles. Why go to this bother to switch it around. I > think you have > > to switch around the heat exchanges and the exhaust too. > Way expensive. >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.