Date:         Mon, 30 Sep 2002 04:44:22 -0700
Reply-To:     Jason Weisberger <jweis@WHY.BOTHER.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Jason Weisberger <jweis@WHY.BOTHER.COM>
Subject:      Re: On I4 Engine Vibration
Comments: To: Frank Grunthaner <FrankGRUN@AOL.COM>
In-Reply-To:  <154.14ffb012.2ac94e71@aol.com>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

> time to mount them. Until then, the vibration is a function of the mount
> (includes the carriers or sub-frame mounting) not the mounting angle!

Unless you also intend to alter the laws of physics, wouldn't vibration
always be a function of the mount, even with a more efficient mount? Just
a better dampening unit and less vibration transferred to the chassis.

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!

Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com

The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.