personally i find the > > Nearly every question has been asked and answered many time and are all > stored in the archives. > comment to be innapropriate in this case. also not a very nice welcome. I use the archives but have found them to be difficult to obtain useful CURRENT information on many subjects. If the archives are the unlimited instant information resource, why does the list exist? Many subjects, as has been noted daily, are of highly opinionated, personal experience nature. to refer to the list where one answer might be found, and not the other 20 variants, or one that has current techniques, parts, supplies is not best. jimt On Wednesday, Oct 2, 2002, at 09:10 America/Denver, Chris McEwen wrote: > My apologies. No further questions. I'll figure it out from here. > > --Chris McEwen > vanagon@socratespress.com |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.