<html> <font size=3>If you attempt to do these calculations by reference to circumference you will introduce unavoidable errors into your calculations because circumference bears only a loose correlation to revolutions per mile conditions for any given tire. Revolutions per mile is the only thing that matters as far as your gears are concerned. For accuracy, it is best to use manufacturers' stated revolutions per mile at X MPH for each tire and IGNORE both tire height and IGNORE tire circumference information. A revolutions per mile number that matches what one would get by calculating that number based on either tire height or circumference is almost certainly not accurate. <br> . <br> At 10:29 AM 10/5/2002 -0400, you wrote:<br> <blockquote type=cite cite>I plugged the Vanagon gear ratios into a ratio computer to see what RPM we<br> are supposed to be turning on the highway. The gear ratios can be found<br> here: <a href="http://volksweb.relitech.com/helmut/GEARBOX.HTM" eudora="autourl">http://volksweb.relitech.com/helmut/GEARBOX.HTM</a> and the calculator can<br> be found here: <a href="http://www.xse.com/leres/ss/calculator.html" eudora="autourl">http://www.xse.com/leres/ss/calculator.html</a>. It appears that<br> the rear end ratio is either 4.83 or 4.86 so I used 4.83 for the<br> calculations. My old 185R14 tires have a circumference of 25.7 inches<br> (tirerack.com figure for Yokohama Y356D tires). According to the figures<br> with the smaller tires the engine was turning 3798 RPM at 70 MPH and 4340<br> RPM at 80 MPH. The LT27x8.5R14 tires have a circumference of 26.5 inches,<br> giving me an engine speed of 3669 RPM at 70 MPH (130 RPM less) and 4193 RPM<br> at 80 MPH (147 RPM less). Theoretical top speed goes up to 103 MPH from 99<br> MPH.<br> <br> Aren't you glad I can now go 4 MPH faster with the larger tires? Ha ha...<br> <br> <br> Chris,<br> <br> '85 Westy. </font></blockquote><br> <div>_______________________________________________</div> <div>Derek Drew </div> <div>CEO & Co-Founder </div> <div><a href="http://www.consumersearch.com/" EUDORA=AUTOURL>http://www.ConsumerSearch.com/</a> </div> <div>New York, NY & Washington DC</div> <div>============================</div> <div> Best Consumer Advice Site </div> <div> PC World Magazine, Aug. 2001,</div> <div>============================</div> <div> ConsumerSearch is Best </div> <div> Newsweek, Nov. 5, 2001 </div> <div>============================</div> <div>derekdrew@rcn.com</div> <div>212-580-6486 </div> <br> Alternate numbers for the industrious phone caller that wants to try every avenue: 212-580-6486 (best), 703-408-1532 (cell); 202-966-7907 (Work), 212-580-4459 (Home), 202-966-0938 (Home), 978-359-8533 (fax [efax]). </html> |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.