on 10/6/02 01:54, JordanVw@AOL.COM at JordanVw@AOL.COM wrote: > In a message dated 10/6/02 4:47:41 AM Eastern Daylight Time, > tornadored@HOTPOP.COM writes: > > >> So, 5lbs more per wheel = 20lbs more >> total unprung = 200lbs sprung. More rough calculation...that would yield >> about a 1 second slower 0-60 because of rotational weight. >> >> I hope I'm missing something here. What are people's real >> world/seat-of-pants results after going big? It almost seems like the >> benefit of the larger/wider tire (in our favorite brand) would be >> outweighed >> by, well, weight. >> >> > > some people are waaaaaay toooooo analytical.
My logic will be the death of me.
James 90 Carat |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.