Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (October 2002, week 1)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sun, 6 Oct 2002 02:10:38 -0700
Reply-To:     Damon Campbell <damoncampbellvw@YAHOO.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Damon Campbell <damoncampbellvw@YAHOO.COM>
Subject:      Re: Bigger Wheels and Unsprung Weight
In-Reply-To:  <B9C54848.444%tornadored@hotpop.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

If your only concern is accelleration, then yes, you should go with a super light weight wheel, with little itty-bitty thin tires, with none of that heavy reinforced sidewall junk either. Take the valve caps off, too. However, last i heard, vanagons weren't really competing with, well, ANY other vehicle in a drag race (except maybe an air-cooled bus :-). Where the v-dubs really shine is their handling, and the larger wheels/lower pro tires accentuate this. Did my van work before i installed those apparently portly Carat2 wheels? Yeah. Does it feel like it drives better after the install? Yeah. I can't definitively say if it is either the wheels or the new tires, but the combo works better than stock. To answer your "seat of the pants" ride quality impression Q, though, my synopsis is that little bumps are a teeeeny bit harsher. Due to heavier wheels or shorter sidewall? I dunno, but it doesn't really bother me. If i was concerned about a hugely plush ride, i'd just get an Impala or somethin. Accelleration is still, well, like a vanagon. Now i just need the bigger brakes to fill up that extra wheel space (the real reason i went 15 in the first place). -Damon

James wrote: I've been considering doing the 15" wheel/tire upgrade and noticed that some of the replacement SA alloys weigh quite a bit more than the stock 14" alloy (18lbs) (according to GoWesty's specs).

Which gets me thinking about the effect that weight has on performance. I would think the added unsprung weight (again, 28%) must have a very significant effect on handling and suspension response. And I've "heard" that 1lb unsprung = 10lbs sprung. So, 5lbs more per wheel = 20lbs more total unprung = 200lbs sprung. More rough calculation...that would yield about a 1 second slower 0-60 because of rotational weight.

I hope I'm missing something here. What are people's real world/seat-of-pants results after going big? It almost seems like the benefit of the larger/wider tire (in our favorite brand) would be outweighed by, well, weight.

Curious.

James 90 Carat

'84 Westy

--------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos, & more faith.yahoo.com


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.