Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 08:26:51 -0400
Reply-To: Jay L Snyder <Jay.L.Snyder@USA.DUPONT.COM>
Sender: Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From: Jay L Snyder <Jay.L.Snyder@USA.DUPONT.COM>
Subject: Re: 1.9 to 2.1 wbx swap questions
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Stick with the simpler Digijet and get one of the Euro-chip ECU's from
Boston Bob. It works!
Jay
Karl M <thewestyman@MINDSPRING.COM>@gerry.vanagon.com> on 10/14/2002
01:05:54 AM
Please respond to Karl M <thewestyman@MINDSPRING.COM>
Sent by: Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM
cc:
Subject: Re: 1.9 to 2.1 wbx swap questions
Thanks for your input, Karl. We've reached a decision and are about to
install the engine/trans tomorrow, using the 2.1 cooling system and 1.9
fuel
system. The 2.1 fuel system wiring from the donor car was not so good, plus
I've heard reports that a 2.1 with Digijet runs even stronger than
Digifant.
We'll see. The cooling system was a no-brainer once we looked at the
difficulty involved, which was basically a trim to the length of the steel
pipes, fitting the plastic junction to the front side of the firewall, and
a
short adaptor hose cut from an old 1.9 hose.
Karl
----- Original Message -----
> Karl,
>
> I finally got my 2.1 installed about a month ago, just two days before
our
> planned trip from Phx to Vancouver - Hell of a test run; doncha think? I
> had purchased the engine from Damian Shaw (great guy, BTW) about a year
> earlier, but due to sime medical problems wasn't able to work on it for a
> while.
>
> Anyway, I installed the entire 2.1 system - it just seemed to be the
right
> thing to do. This way I have the most up-to-date system overall. Don't
> know if my judgment was right, but it's done!
>
> Problems were relatively minor. The biggest I recall was the surprise
that
> I had to replace the big plastic pipes, since they are different lengths
> for the new system. The dashpot for the charcoal cannister needs to be
> relocated outside the engine compartment (no room for the larger air
> cleaner). relocating the CPU inside the van required using a 2" hole saw
> and a threaded rivet gun for mounting the cover. I don't recall any other
> changes that were unexpected, and will report to you if I recall any. It
> was just a lot of work, since I had the tranny out and was replacing all
of
> the fuel tank lines at the same time.
>
> Final results: Better and smoother power and more torque (by
seat-of-the-
> pants measurement). Seems to be quieter than the 1.9 (heavier exhaust
> components?). The 2.1 cooling system seems much easier to bleed, and the
> position of the thermostat housing has to be an improvement (the 1.9 t'
> housing is a bitch to get off if the bolts have corroded, and they
usually
> have). If I had it to do over again (thank God I don't), I'd do it the
> same way.
>
> Incidentally, I had a .77 4th gear installed during the tranny rebuild,
and
> am not looking back on that one. My theory on 2.1l stretch bolt problems
> is that they are due in large part to long-term over-revving. I am now
> cruising quite comfortable at 3800-4000 rpm, while with the stock gearing
I
> was regularly well over 4K (long flat desert drives).
>
> Good luck,
>
> Karl Wolz
This communication is for use by the intended recipient and contains
information that may be privileged, confidential or copyrighted under
applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
formally notified that any use, copying or distribution of this e-mail,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender
by return e-mail and delete this e-mail from your system. Unless
explicitly and conspicuously designated as "E-Contract Intended",
this e-mail does not constitute a contract offer, a contract amendment,
or an acceptance of a contract offer. This e-mail does not constitute
a consent to the use of sender's contact information for direct marketing
purposes or for transfers of data to third parties.
Francais Deutsch Italiano Espanol Portuges Japanese Chinese Korean
http://www.DuPont.com/corp/email_disclaimer.html
|