Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (October 2002, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 8 Oct 2002 19:04:05 +0100
Reply-To:     Clive Smith <clive.harman-smith@NTLWORLD.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Clive Smith <clive.harman-smith@NTLWORLD.COM>
Subject:      Re: best speed for best gas mileage
Comments: To: Anthony Polson <acpolson@HOTMAIL.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

>The engine speed at which the maximum torque occurs is not relevant. Slower = better mileage. That's it.

WRONG. Even though it may not be the engine speed to cruise at for best economy, max Torque (= Min SFC) - it is certainly relevant. Take the case of an engine with a cam with a lot of overlap. The torque curve will fall quite dramatically beneath the maximum, as a lot of of fuel and air are either coming out the exhaust or being spat back into the inlet manifold, or the cylinder filling will be just plain poor, but the pumping and frictional losses are the same as ever. As you venture into this region you are obviously just wasting fuel, though the payoff with reduced drag may mean driving below best SFC/Max torque speed. However reduced the drag on the vehicle is as you cruise slower and slower there will always come a point when the fuel consumption starts going up (town driving?). In the case of a 'cammy' engine, that engine speed in top (or even one down from top in windy/hill climbing adventures) will be higher than you are suggesting. The VW flat fours are not 'cammy' as such, quite the opposite and probably have quite flat torque curves, but the principle remains that slower, doesn't always = better mileage. The aerodynamically draggy nature also mitigates towards lower cruise speeds for best mileage.

30 mph is too slow for my 2.1 Syncro in top, 50-55 always seems a good max range speed when low on fuel and looking for a filling station, maybe a bit high, but I'd have to be desperate to start cruising about in 3rd for any distance!

A good tip is to ensure that you try to follow the rules for constant energy driving - slow down progressively when climbing hills, keeping the engine at maximum torque speed or thereabouts, speed up going down hills and use that speed to burn-off up the next climb if its a roller coaster road (motorways are like that in the UK, sometimes for mile after mile, and the same twats come roaring past you uphill and then lift off down the next slope to avoid breaking the speedlimit, real or imagined - thinking they're so safe and smart drivers). Being draggy, the vanagon will not gain as much using this technique as a heavy (dense) but slippery vehicle with a good overdrive top but nevertheless, theoretically its the way to drive roller coasters, going very slow over the peaks with loads of potential energy just waiting to be converted to kinetic on the way down the next slope. Of course, I might be the twit here, pissing off people who just want to roll along at the same speed come hill or high water - as in 'Cruise Controls' - about the worst thing man has invented - 'Ok, go to sleep if you must, and while you're at it, I'll burn more fuel keeping a constant speed than you could even if you were trying' - seems to be the philosophy.

Clive

----- Original Message ----- From: "Anthony Polson" <acpolson@HOTMAIL.COM> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 5:52 PM Subject: Re: best speed for best gas mileage

> Hi Nathan, > > As with any vehicle, the slower you go, the better the > mileage. That's an inevitable consequence of the > unchangeable Laws of Physics. > > Go at the lowest speed (in top gear) that the vehicle is > comfortable with - I've heard it defined as the "lowest > non-snatch speed in top gear". > > The engine speed at which the maximum torque occurs is > not relevant. Slower = better mileage. That's it. > > The problem is, progress at 25 mph may be a little slow! > > Good luck! > > Tony > > '84 Vanagon Reimo > > > >------------- Original Message ----------------- > > > >Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 18:15:52 -0500 > >From: Dart 330 <dart330@HOTMAIL.COM> > >Subject: best speed for best gas mileage > > > >I am curious at what highway speed my Vanagon will get the best gas mileage > >at. Would it be at the max engine torque rpm (2800 for my 1.9 I think)? I > >am > >planning a trip for Thanksgiving break and am considering slowing down from > >my usual 4000 rpm cruise to save gas money and enjoy the scenery a little > >more. > > > >Thanks, > >Nathan > >85 Westy > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.