Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (October 2002, week 3)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sat, 19 Oct 2002 11:44:56 +0100
Reply-To:     Clive Smith <clive.harman-smith@NTLWORLD.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Clive Smith <clive.harman-smith@NTLWORLD.COM>
Subject:      Re: Increasing horsepower
Comments: To: John Rodgers <j_rodgers@charter.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

This was called turbo-compounding, a very different thing from straight supercharging, or straight turbocharging, the main benefit here being fuel efficiency. Not quite sure what that 33% figure actually refers to - it could mean anything - and probably does!

More weight and complexity involved here, but they did in fact improve specific consumption considerably and over a transatlantic flight, easily paid that back in fuel load. The advent of the gas turbine soon put a stop to any further developments in that sphere, the 3340 being about the ultimate aero piston engine development, though a Super Connie arriving at Heathrow in that era would rarely be fit for a quick turnaround, with oil dripping from most of its engines, if not requiring a new parts. In contrast, Bristol Hercules and Centaurus sleeve-valve radials would run quite happily for 3,000 hours between overhauls - quite unheard of elsewhere. I think those big US radials might have reached 2000 hours in theory, but had a lot to go wrong with all those hot parts and gearing, poppet valves etc. Gas turbines of course soon moved up to the 5 and then 9,000 hours MTBO (JT8D-9) and today have staggering overhaul intervals, no wonder piston aero-engines were dropped like a hot brick over just a few years - '.. you mean some of the bits went up-and-down rather than round and round, crickey, why they do that then!'

Clive

----- Original Message ----- From: "John Rodgers" <j_rodgers@charter.net> To: "Clive Smith" <clive.harman-smith@ntlworld.com> Cc: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2002 3:41 AM Subject: Re: Increasing horsepower

> Clive Smith wrote: > > > > > In fact it maybe takes 1000 hp to drive the superchargers! > > > > Yes, it does take a bit of power to driver them. But there is some > efficiency. The old 3340's on the Willie Victors (Super Connies) had > three turbine power recovery systems mounted in the the exhaust > collectors. As I recall there was a reported 33% power recovery. Thats > pretty amazing. > > John Rodgers > 88 GL Driver >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.