Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2002 17:23:37 -0500
Reply-To: Jay L Snyder <Jay.L.Snyder@USA.DUPONT.COM>
Sender: Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From: Jay L Snyder <Jay.L.Snyder@USA.DUPONT.COM>
Subject: Re: '85 not level?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Exactly. Levels out very well with driver, 1 passenger and a full tank of
gas.
westydriver <westydriver@TACTICAL-BUS.INFO>@gerry.vanagon.com> on
11/01/2002 11:42:51 PM
Please respond to westydriver <westydriver@TACTICAL-BUS.INFO>
Sent by: Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM
cc:
Subject: Re: '85 not level?
you might also want to put about 300 lbs in the front and then check
the level. simulating a driver and pax into the equation. my 82 is
slightly higher in front with new shocks on the rear.
jimt
On Friday, Nov 1, 2002, at 12:35 US/Pacific, mark drillock wrote:
> For accuracy sake, you might want to compare measurements from the
> fender edge to the center of each axle. The measurements to the ground
> will vary with tire size and inflation pressures.
>
> Mark
>
> Joachim Preiss wrote:
>>
>> I remember reading on the list a while back, that the front on '85
>> Vanagons is
>> set up higher than other years, which sounds kinda strange. But this
>> was only
>> a single comment and topic was discontinued.
>>
>> Now I don't have a 2nd vanagon to compare with, but when I look at my
>> '85
>> Westfalia, it's obvious that the rear is sitting a lot lower than the
>> front.
>> So I took a tape measure and measured the distance from the pavement
>> to the
>> fender arch. Here are the numbers, both with a driver in the driver's
>> seat,
>> and same left & right):
>> 28" front
>> 26" rear
This communication is for use by the intended recipient and contains
information that may be privileged, confidential or copyrighted under
applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
formally notified that any use, copying or distribution of this e-mail,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender
by return e-mail and delete this e-mail from your system. Unless
explicitly and conspicuously designated as "E-Contract Intended",
this e-mail does not constitute a contract offer, a contract amendment,
or an acceptance of a contract offer. This e-mail does not constitute
a consent to the use of sender's contact information for direct marketing
purposes or for transfers of data to third parties.
Francais Deutsch Italiano Espanol Portugues Japanese Chinese Korean
http://www.DuPont.com/corp/email_disclaimer.html