Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (November 2002, week 1)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 4 Nov 2002 10:07:49 -0500
Reply-To:     "G.M.Bulley" <gmbulley@BULLEY-HEWLETT.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         "G.M.Bulley" <gmbulley@BULLEY-HEWLETT.COM>
Organization: Bulley-Hewlett
Subject:      Re: VW's Diesel vs. Gas
Comments: To: Andrew Grebneff <andrew.grebneff@STONEBOW.OTAGO.AC.NZ>
In-Reply-To:  <f05100305b9ebbba52f00@[203.167.180.229]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

AG wrote: "The only VW diesel I've driven was a 78 Golf 1.6..."

For those who haven't driven a new TDI, you need to. Once of my first vehicles was a 1976 1.4 liter diesel Rabbit (automatic). You literally had to keep it floored 90% of the time, and the clatter was deafening . It was really a sad piece of equipment.

My (current) 1985 TD Jetta is a joy, albeit still a bit sloth-like of the line, and still a little rumble-some. On the highway, it drives like a gasser, but consistently gets 43+ MPG even though I show it no mercy.

The new TDI's are nearly orgasmic. They are quiet, smooth, extremely powerful, non-smokers, and in many ways far superior to their gas counterparts. If given the option between two new Jettas, one full featured, and Gas, the other stripped down and TDI, the TDI would be the clear winner.

$.02

Bringing your ideas to life, G. Matthew Bulley Bulley-Hewlett www.bulley-hewlett.com AIM: IExplain4u +1.919.658.1278 11111111111111111111.

-----Original Message----- From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM] On Behalf Of Andrew Grebneff Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 4:45 AM To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM Subject: Re: VW's Diesel vs. Gas

>On 11/3/02 12:13 PM, "Matthew Libby" <MLibby1@CFL.RR.COM> wrote: > >> Im looking to buy a VW golf (2003), and cant decide between the TDI (diesel) >> or the gas. Im torn. The diesel is 2k more than the gas and >>offers only 90hp >> compared to 115hp in the gas. However, it offers 20ftlbs more torque and >> almost 50mpg! Can anyone tell me anything about these two engines, >> reliability, longevity, maintainence, perfomance... >> >> PS- im selling my westy to pay for this, any buyers? > > I highly recommend the TDI. It has it's maintenance quirks, but nowhere >near those of the Vanagon. It is a dream to drive and the 50+ MPG with the >ability to run on Biodiesel is great. > > 90hp is for starters. With a few quick performance mods (chip, >injectors/nozzles, intake and exhaust) you can end up well over 150hp. > > I highly recommend heading on over to http://www.tdiclub.com and reading >the FAQ.

The only VW diesel I've driven was a 78 Golf 1.6, and it was gutless. But I'd swear by Toyota's 1.8 and 2.0 diesels. If modern VW diesels are anywhere near as good I'd say go for it. -- Andrew Grebneff 165 Evans St, Dunedin 9001, New Zealand <andrew.grebneff@stonebow.otago.ac.nz> Seashell, Macintosh, VW/Toyota van nut


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.