Date:         Mon, 18 Nov 2002 12:11:50 -0700
Reply-To:     Bill N <freeholder@STARBAND.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Bill N <freeholder@STARBAND.NET>
Subject:      Re: An opinion on top/bottom posting
Comments: To: David Beierl <dbeierl@ATTGLOBAL.NET>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

I did include you, but may have misunderstood what you meant.  Your paragraph below says
"bottom quote" which I took to mean the quoted portion goes on the bottom with the new text
above it, so I listed you as one of two people in the section "on top, unless the quoted
section is very short."  If that is wrong, let me know and I will move you to the correct
section.

Bill

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Beierl" <dbeierl@ATTGLOBAL.NET>
>
> Since my message of my own posting philosophy apparently didn't reach Bill,
> I'll take the liberty of repeating it here:
>
> >On top if short answer that uses a short msg as context -- entire thing
> >should be visible on one screen; if not, bottom quote.
> >On bottom if quoting a particular chunk of a message.
> >[generalizes to] individual responses below quoted chunks.