Date:         Tue, 26 Nov 2002 08:16:57 -0800
Reply-To:     gary hradek <hradek@YAHOO.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         gary hradek <hradek@YAHOO.COM>
Subject:      tank 403b or 403A
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

I bought a tank that I expected to be 025 121 407 B.
My very old tank was clearly marked 025 121 407 B.
The new tank is 025 121 407 A   in all ways it appers
to be the correct fit.   So why is there this change
in markings and part number.   In All fairness to
JoAnn her part was a better match than the one I
returned to VW.   Is it possible that this part is
slated to be discontinued?   Is the new tank with the
403 A nos that is very old since I have a 403b in my
87 vanagon?
           gary
Is JoAnn correct about part number 025 121 407A?


JoAnn,
     What is confusing me is that my very old tank is
stamped with the 025 121 407 B.   The new tank looks
to be a good match but has the 403 A?   I think that
if you sell any more of these tanks you need to
acknowledge that they are stamped 403A but fit 403B
applications.   Make this change and I will be more
than happy to leave positive feedback.
              thanks gary
     If this is the only tank
--- LAZY8 8 <lazy82002@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Gary,
>
> The Part# (025 121 407 A) stamped in the tank is an
> old number and was
> superceded to Part# (025 121 403 B)which should be
> the number on the sticker
> on the tank. Sorry for the confusion. If you have
> any other questions,
> please let me know.
>
> JoAnn
>
>
> >From: gary hradek <hradek@yahoo.com>
> >To: LAZY8 8 <lazy82002@hotmail.com>
> >Subject: RE: Ebay Invoice Item#1872457887
> >Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 20:14:18 -0800 (PST)
> >
> >JoAnn,
> >       I aprreciate the positive feedback but
> uncertain
> >what kind of feedback to leave.   What I expected
> was
> >The part # is 025 121 403 B.  What I got was
> clearly
> >marked  025 121 403 A.   Could you explain this
> >difference.  The feedback I leave is both to ebay
> and
> >the vanagon list.    I should like to share
> positive
> >information and some reason why you would not use
> the
> >proper part number.  The part looks good but I am
> >puzzled.
>
>http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1872457887&ssPageName=ADME:B:EOAB:US:6
> >thanks gary
> >--- LAZY8 8 <lazy82002@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > I have left "POSITIVE" feedback for you, and
> would
> > > appreciate it if you
> > > would recipricate.
> > >
> > > Thanks for the order!
> > >
> > > JoAnn
> > >
>

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com