In a message dated 12/22/02 5:34:59 AM, Cotsford@AOL.COM writes: << Mine works out bigger. I am using 205/70 x 14. 205 x .7 = 143.5 / 25.4 = 5.64" (5.64 x 2) + 14 = 25.28" diameter which gives a radius of 12.64" >> Even accepting the invalid use of an equality sign, this calculation ignores the quantity which is being sought, that being the ROLLING RADIUS. Perhaps someone, somewhere is able to consider the many variables involved and with a sharpened pencil in hand, accurately calculate the rolling radius of a particular tire, on a particular car, rolling down the highway at a particular speed, but I can assure you that the equation he uses will have more than a few elements. This reminds me of one of my favorite homilies: Measure it with a micrometer; mark it with a crayon; cut it with a chainsaw. George |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.