Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (January 2003, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 9 Jan 2003 09:16:52 -0800
Reply-To:     TJ Hannink <tjhannink@YAHOO.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         TJ Hannink <tjhannink@YAHOO.COM>
Subject:      Re: Total Cost of a complete engine overhaul
In-Reply-To:  <Pine.SUN.3.96.1030109091317.24631D-100000@grex.cyberspace.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

The O.E. alternator on my van was replaced at 75,000 miles. The P.O's first rebuilt replacement worked for more than 100,000 miles. I expect my current alternator to last at least that long. I have all my starters and alternators for my (and my friends) various vehicles rebuilt at a local auto electric shop and have never had to replace any of their products. My '75 bus used to eat parts store Bosch rebuilt starters, a new Bosch starter lasted a couple of years. The current local shop rebuild has been in for 6 years.

I don't agree with the "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" theory of vehicle maintenance. In order to inspect most connectors, mounting surfaces and hoses, it's necessary to disassemble them. My ecu is original, but I have removed it, blown the dust out of it, cleaned the connector and ground point and re-installed it without a problem. I've removed, cleaned and re-assembled (with corrosion protection) every electrical connection in the engine compartment and on the exterior of the vehicle. Is this overkill? Probably, but with all the problems you read on the list caused by corroded connections, I think its pretty good insurance.

Thanks for listening.

Tim

--- David Brodbeck <gull@CYBERSPACE.ORG> wrote: > I agree, but I think replacing parts like the ECU and alternator is > unnecessary unless they're showing signs of problems. My feeling is that > replacing parts like that preventatively is as likely to cause problems as > it is to prevent them. Wiring harnesses get disturbed, bolts get > loosened, hoses get pushed out of the way...and every so often that causes > an unexpected failure a few miles down the road. The ECU that's in there > has been working fine for years, why disturb it now? It has no moving > parts and it doesn't wear out unless something breaks from vibration or is > damaged by a wiring problem. Alternators sometimes fail but have been > known to last the life of a car, too -- and an OEM alternator is much > better than a rebuild you got from the parts store. >

===== TJ Hannink Goldibox - 1987 Vanagon Camper, Wolfsburg Edition Winter Park, Florida http://home.earthlink.net/~tjhannink/ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wolfsburg_campers http://photos.yahoo.com/tjhannink [Vanagon] Album

__________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo! http://sbc.yahoo.com


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.