Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (February 2003, week 1)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 6 Feb 2003 01:32:42 -0500
Reply-To:     David Beierl <dbeierl@ATTGLOBAL.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         David Beierl <dbeierl@ATTGLOBAL.NET>
Subject:      Re: pelonis ceramic heater
Comments: To: Marc Perdue <marcperdue@ADELPHIA.NET>
In-Reply-To:  <3E41E3CD.C4E617EB@adelphia.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

At 11:25 PM 2/5/2003, Marc Perdue wrote: >One other note about heaters that David didn't mention, for those of you >concerned about the environment and squandering of resources (oh wait, we >drive >big old gas-guzzling vehicles...), is that for every unit of electricity that >you convert completely to heat, a seemingly 100% efficient operation, 3 units >of some other fuel source are required to create it. In other words, even if >you convert all the electricity to heat, you're still only operating at 33 1/3

I was going to let that lie... <g> The thing is that the numbers are getting better. Modern-technology power plants co-generating steam with recovered heat from the stack gases can achieve something astonishing -- close to 90% total energy recovery IIRC. Unfortunately the Federal regulatory structure, at least as it was when I was reading an article on this a few years ago, actually discourages this sort of investment because of the greatly differing requirements for new plant as opposed to maintenance and improvements on old plant. And when smaller outfits (MIT was a case study in this article) want to build efficient cogenerating facilities for internal operation they still need to have peak and emergency capacity available from the utilities -- which often charge so much merely to keep the hookup active (and of course to maintain the peak capacity they need) that the brilliant economic win becomes a net loss and the plant doesn't get built. So in practice the average conversion efficiency is still down in the 35% region...but it doesn't have to be.

david

-- David Beierl - Providence RI USA -- http://pws.prserv.net/synergy/Vanagon/ '84 Westy "Dutiful Passage" '85 GL "Poor Relation"


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.