Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (February 2003, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 14 Feb 2003 13:55:05 -0500
Reply-To:     ian Butler <ian@BLUEMOON.HPLX.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         ian Butler <ian@BLUEMOON.HPLX.NET>
Subject:      Re: Raining-no cruise control
Comments: To: Kim Brennan <kimbrennan@MAC.COM>
In-Reply-To:  <6198CD02-4048-11D7-A63B-00039398EEBC@mac.com>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Kim Brennan wrote:

> Hmm, Let me disagree with your analysis, but mostly support your > conclusion... > > Cruise controls work by monitoring the speed of the car...AS MONITORED > BY THE VEHICLES CONTROLS. > > If you are hydroplaning, those controls may not register the actual > vehicle speed accurately. I've seen a 40 mph difference between actual > speeds and monitored speed (i.e. speedometer) when hydroplaning (I was > doing 60 and the speedometer read 20). Rear wheel drive vehicle (VW > bug) and the speedometer cable connects to the front wheels.

One would think that, to a point, cruise control would help maintain control as long as it was measuring the speed of the drive wheels (syncro, every other front-engine car except for the optional speedo on Ford Model A's. :) If you were going 65 down the freeway and hit a puddle, all the throttle keeping you at that speed might break the wheels loose. The measured speed would increase as the tires slipped, and the cruise would reduce throttle until measured speed hit 65 again. At that point your tires might be slipping still, but it would be close to road speed as long as the puddle didn't slow you too much.

This isn't to advocate using cruise in poor conditions, especially on something like the Vanagon that wouldn't easily detect road slip unless it's extra-smart and watches revs. The last car I drove with cruise was a 1995 Econoline, and that sucker was squirrely at best. It had a lethargic reaction time that made for a rollercoaster-like speed drift combined with eventual violent downshifts. (Instead of shifting from 4-3 immediately on a hill to keep the van at 75, it'd wait till speed slipped to 70 and shift 4-2 -- made quite a racket and threw everybody around but good.) The trouble in bad conditions was that if it lost speed on a hill and did that, the scads of torque and violent shift would break the wheels free, almost ensuring loss of control. Whereas if it'd been paying attention it would have been able to modulate the throttle about as well as person could.

I've yet to own a VW with cruise, factory or otherwise, though I'd happily accept donations for any OEM components so I can review them properly and firsthand!

ian Butler / ian@bluemoon.hplx.net '88 Scirocco 16v, '87 Syncro GL


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.