Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (February 2003, week 3)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sat, 22 Feb 2003 13:38:53 +1300
Reply-To:     Andrew Grebneff <andrew.grebneff@STONEBOW.OTAGO.AC.NZ>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Andrew Grebneff <andrew.grebneff@STONEBOW.OTAGO.AC.NZ>
Subject:      Re: What's wrong with my VW? Friday
In-Reply-To:  <20030221.085720.1528.3.wilden1@juno.com>
Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii

>Many of the problems encountered with VW engines is the extreme lack of >maintenance.

I can't agree. Modern engines should be low-maintenance, and coolant type uncritical. VW is neither. Japanese engines will take abuse and total lack of maintenance and still give really high milages (of coures there ARE unreliable Japanese engines, but most are bulletproof).

> The soultion to Bad Engines isn't an engine conversion.

Sure it is.

>Replacing your engine is 90% of good thinking but neglecting other things >like the injectors, distributor, proper grounding, proper fuel pressure >will get you about 90% of the potential of your new engine.

Possibly, but that doesn't the counter head corrosion or crank failure VW's wasserboxers are so prone to.

Admittedly VW boxers can be decent performers (both air & watercooled), though these good-performing ones were never sold in USA, unfortunately. But the 112hp wasserboxers, and the Oettinger six versions, suffered from all of the problems the US engines have.

>I must say at this point; I was absolutely astounded at the performance >of the pure stock Air Cooled VW engine after giving the external >components as much consideration as I did the internal engine parts. >Try it .............. you'll like it.

My 75 Bay had its stock 1.8 twin-carb engine, with a 1916 slip-in kit fitted. Power was estimated at somewhere a bit over 100hp. It would easily hit 140kmh and still accelerating well; up the longest steepest hill with a full load it would sit on 90kmh in third. Shame the kit wasn't the best quality, and it had a piston which was perforated... eventually burned badly. Fun while it lasted, though. -- Andrew Grebneff 165 Evans St, Dunedin 9001, New Zealand <andrew.grebneff@stonebow.otago.ac.nz> Seashell, Macintosh, VW/Toyota van nut


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.