>It's very wishful thinking. It isn't a matter of getting them crash >tested or emissions tested. Frankly they simply won't pass current >safety requirements. A lot of new safety requirments have been >instituted since 1992. Among them are air bags (they ain't in the SA >ones from the pictures I've seen), 5 mph bumpers on "cars" (I'm not >sure the Vanagon's are even 2.5mph approved ones.) I believe the >engines would also have to be OBD compliant (probably OBD II since >1997). While the inline 4 and 5 cylinder engines could meet this last >with little effort by VW, it is highly unlikely (due to expense) that >VW would ever see a profit in making the Wasserboxer OBD compliant. All late-model South African vans use the 2.6 Audi five. -- Andrew Grebneff 165 Evans St, Dunedin 9001, New Zealand <andrew.grebneff@stonebow.otago.ac.nz> Seashell, Macintosh, VW/Toyota van nut |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.