Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (February 2003, week 4)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sat, 22 Feb 2003 20:14:52 -0000
Reply-To:     Herb Mooney <hmooney@RESTOREANDMORE.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Herb Mooney <hmooney@RESTOREANDMORE.COM>
Subject:      Re: I4 engine/vibrations - A few quick comments
Comments: To: FrankGRUN@AOL.COM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Sorry for the interuption, but who else besides Saab made these "hydraulic (actively damped) engine mounts"? I getting ready for transplanting a Ford 2.3 Turbo motor into my 84 Vanagon and need to address the ballance issue as well.

Thanks,

Herb in PA

----- Original Message ----- From: "Frank Grunthaner" <FrankGRUN@AOL.COM> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 12:48 AM Subject: I4 engine/vibrations - A few quick comments

> In a message dated 2/23/03 4:12:07 PM, McNock@EASYSTREET.COM writes: > > << beat to death yes, but definitively figured out - no! (at least for this > > van!) > > > I have been to your website may times (fabulous and thanks) and searched the > > achives many times. Below I have a list of all that has been done. > > > It is mostly everything every discussed. That is why I am so frustated. > > Better, Absolutely. Fixed - well no. >> > > You'e definitely correct on your website observations, but fall a bit short > on the summary. I have indicated in the past and at some length a number of > technical issues that come to the solution including the mounting of the > exhaust, the coupling of the exhaust and the details of the engine mount. > > Of all of these, resonance plays a powerful role. After eliminating the basic > engine issues (bent pulleys, H/A mounting brackets and exhaust coupling) you > will return to the engine mount and its active or passive isolation > technology. All manufacturers of large displacement 4 cylinder in line > engines must confront this problem. The problem is minor at 1.6L, more > significant at 1.8L, a real discomfort at 2.0L and a major pain in the tush > at 2.3 and above. All manufacturers (VW. Porsche, Audi, Mercedes, SAAB, Volvo > to name a few Euro's) adopt one of two solutions: Addition of a balance shaft > to the engine or the use of hydraulic (actively damped) engine mounts. I have > adapted the SAAB hydraulic mount to the VW Vanagon diesel mounting system > (refers to the '82 design only since this is what I play with). On my test > stand, the Audi 3A 2.0L engine (inline 4) with turbo is vibration free. But I > have more work to do for better clearance. I have not yet been able to mount > the new engine in the Vanagon, so I haven't conducted any vibration > measurements yet. I will! > > In the meantime feel free to experiment with the hydraulics. BTW your > description of differences betwixt the 82 and later varients also misses a > few key points. > > Frank Grunthaner


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.