Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (April 2003, week 1)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 4 Apr 2003 00:11:09 -0600
Reply-To:     Joel Walker <jwalker17@EARTHLINK.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Joel Walker <jwalker17@EARTHLINK.NET>
Subject:      Re: Goofy Coolant Refresh Idea
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

> Every month, simply drain out 1/Nth of the coolant from one of the drainable > spots. Replace it with a fresh 1/Nth of proper coolant/water mix. At any > given time coolant in the vehicle still has an average "life" of N months. > Of course, I'm assuming the coolant of different ages mixes perfectly. I > have no reason to believe it wouldn't. It is never perfectly new, never > completely spent. Actually, Nth interval can be multiple months, if so > desired, as long as the "averaging" process is unaffected. > What you think, eh?

i kinda doubt it would be effective .. reason being, what you need to prevent corrosion is a level of concentration of the additives. same thing with lubricating the water pump. say the level of concentration has dropped to a dangerous level just prior to your adding an additional 1/N coolant ... that much new coolant might NOT be enough to bring the concentration back up to protective levels. :( the idea is to put a full concentration in, then do it again before the coolant additives drop below a level that can still protect.

let's see what we can figure out ... we've got about 18 liters of coolant. figure a 50-50 mix and that's 9 liters of antifreeze and 9 liters of water. so we'll make up some number and call that 100 percent = 0.5 (concentration?) they tell us that we should change the coolant every two years. that the additives will be totally depleted in three years. that's 36 months. to go from 100 percent (0.5) to 0 percent (0.0??) in 36 months means, if it's a linear process ... depleting the same amount or percentage each day or each mile, that we can expect 100/36 or 2.78 percent loss of additives per month. or 0.5/36 = 0.0139 (concentration?) per month. awright ... so what's 'dangerous'?? below 10 percent? that would be ..0.05 concentration? well, who knows ... so let's pick something. say 20 percent or 0.1 concentration. so how long will that take to get down to 20 percent? 100-20 = 80, 80/2.78 = 28.8 months or say 29 months. hmmm. just about two years. how bout that. :)

now, at 29 months, you add what ... 1/29th of the 18 liters? if i read you correctly. so that's also 1/29th of the 9 liters of pure antifreeze ... so we added what? 0.31 liters of antifreeze? so how do we figure the new concentration? if we have 18 liters that is down to 20 percent (instead of 100 percent), that means that instead of 9 liters of pure antifreeze, we have only the equivalent of 0.2 x 9 or 1.8 liters of pure antifreeze. if we remove the 1/29th of 18 liters (0.62 liters), we should still have 17.38 liters at the same 20 percent. now we add back 0.62 liters but at 100 percent. so we had 18 liters at 20 percent, or 1.8 liters of pure antifreeze. we take away 1/29th of the 18 liters and that means 1/29th of the 1.8 liters that are left ... or 0.062 liters of pure antifreeze. leaving 1.8-0.062 = 1.738 liters left in the 20 percent concentration. then we add back 0.31 liters. so 1.738 + 0.31 = 2.048 liters of pure antifreeze in a 18 liters system (remember we added back the whole 1/29th).

so we went from 1.8 liters (20 percent) to 2.048 liters ... and that should be 22.76 percent (if i did that right). not a whole lot of increase... but it did go back up above 'dangerous' (what we defined 20 percent as). but next month, we do the same thing ... and if we are losing 2.78 percent each month, we're right back where we started: at the dangerous level. acutally, a tiny bit below it.

is this right?

argh, that makes my head hurt. :) anyway, i kinda don't think it's a good idea. just because! ;)

joel


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.