Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (April 2003, week 4)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 28 Apr 2003 22:06:03 -0400
Reply-To:     David Brodbeck <gull@GULL.US>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         David Brodbeck <gull@GULL.US>
Subject:      Re: [vanagon] Re: electric or hybrid conversion?
Comments: To: Joel Walker <jwalker17@EARTHLINK.NET>
In-Reply-To:  <007701c30dec$ffd64020$0892aec7@D1DY3621>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed

Joel Walker wrote: > see, to me, the better choice would be a hybrid .... but not the > way they are doing it. back to the original porsche car ... first > car he ever designed: gasoline (or diesel) generator to power > four electric motors, one at each wheel. all-time 4wd.

This is called a "series hybrid". The hybrid cars currently on the market are "parallel hybrids".

> only problem i can see is the transmission. how to have one. or > do you need one?

It depends on the electric motor(s) you use. If you do need a transmission, it'll be a very simple one. Most electric cars that have been produced have used a simple fixed reduction drive. Electric motors start producing torque at 0 rpm, and have very flat torque curves, so there's no need for multiple ratios. The experimental series hybrid I saw at my college used an 8:1 reduction drive. This was good from 0 mph all the way up to 80 mph (which corresponded to the motor's maximum RPM.)

> that seems to me to be a better idea than this toyota prius and > honda insight hybrid stuff. those designs, to me, seem way too > complicated ... i mean, you've taken the already complicate > internal combustion engine and its emission problems and made it > worse (by adding the electric side of things).

Well, a series hybrid doesn't get away from that. You still have an IC engine. I think there are two reasons we've mostly seen parallel hybrids so far:

- Expense. You need a much bigger motor for a series hybrid. Likewise, the power electronics need to handle more current. This all adds up to a more expensive vehicle.

- Trust. People don't really trust the electrical stuff in hybrids yet. A parallel hybrid has a built in limp-home mode, since it can move on engine power alone.

--

David Brodbeck, N8SRE '82 Diesel Westfalia '94 Honda Civic Si


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.