Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (May 2003, week 3)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 21 May 2003 10:53:14 -0700
Reply-To:     wilden1@JUNO.COM
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Stan Wilder <wilden1@JUNO.COM>
Subject:      Re: Are non German pistons really shorter than German pistons?
Comments: To: Wolfvan88@AOL.COM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Nothing surprises me anymore about VW parts. I've been in some raging arguments about deck height and just out of curiosity I checked the length on some VW Type IV cylinder barrels. I found that between them OEM, Cofap and Mahle there can be as much as .030 difference in length. This might be to accommodate the VW tech note of no base seal or to work better with the no head gasket situation with AMC heads. The Cofap and Mahle cylinders were new, the VW OEMs were ten years old .............. I didn't record my findings on which were the longest or shortest. I like to run .028 deck height (my definition of deck height is the distance between the closest piston to the closest head surface). I just don't see that the down in the hole reading actually represents a proper calculation of compression or possible collision of the piston with the head, especially on heads that have recessed the cylinder to head mating surface as many OEM VW heads will do. This frenzy of measuring was brought on because I couldn't get less than .070 deck height on a new engine I was building. I first suspected the crankshaft had been reground improperly, that wasn't the case. It was the cylinder length. Swapping out the cylinders brought me into the specs I had intended. There also could have been a difference in the wrist pin center to piston top but I didn't peruse those measurements.

Stan Wilder

On Wed, 21 May 2003 10:51:08 EDT Robert Lilley <Wolfvan88@AOL.COM> writes: > Is it true that replacement 94 mm WBX non-German pistons are 1 mm > shorter > than the German pistons? > > I was told this by a company that is now selling performance WBX > engines. > > > Robert > >

________________________________________________________________ The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand! Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER! Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.