Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (June 2003, week 3)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 18 Jun 2003 15:10:54 -0500
Reply-To:     John Rodgers <j_rodgers@CHARTER.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         John Rodgers <j_rodgers@CHARTER.NET>
Subject:      Refrigerant Regulatory Crap!! (long)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed

I've been following the thread on "New AC Thing" and in reading some of the referenced urls, have come to the conclusion that there is a bunch of regualtory crap being pushed to try and control and channel the use of certain refrigerants to someones benefit!!

Strange that R-12 should suddenly become a "dangerous ozone depleteing agent" and disappear from the market aobut the time it's patent ran out.

Strange that the Flamability of 134a is well above that of R-12, yet comparable refrigerants are referred to as dangerous.

Strange that the Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection is warning consumers and businesses about Duracool, Enviro-Safe, HC 12a, OZ-12, and Maxi-Frig 12a, Red-Tek 12a, and others as illegal refrigerants, when the EPA website lists them and tells you exactly which fittings are needed for each one to be safe for use, and what tags and marking to use to be legal.

Check this from the Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and consumer Protection website.

Quote: "People are being told Red-TeK 12a and other illegal hydrocarbon-based refrigerants are environmentally safe replacements for R-12 and R-134a", Cardin says. "Nothing could be further from the truth."

R-12, commonly referred to as Freon, is an ozone-depleting substance no longer manufactured in the U.S., and R-134a is the industry accepted refrigerant replacement for use in vehicle air conditioning systems. *********** Why is the R-134a being considered the industry standard? I suspect it is because the others are not allowed to compete.

My suspicion is that this is all a crock of BS, and that it is a market control manuver to eliminate the competition.

Why shouldn't there be alternate refrigerants available. How is it that in a market place as big as America, in all the vehicles being manufactured today, that ONLY one refrigerant is considered acceptable?

I find something majorly wrong with this.

Lets see!! Hmmm, here's my Cervel refrigerator/freezer manual -yep, kerosene burner provides the energy, ammonia is the gas ---- yep, calculations show it will drop the temp to "zero" derees then a small fan to circulate cold air over the coils, thru the ducts into the cab, hmmm, yep I think this is going to wok really well on that desert trip this summer........yep. And it doesn't use 5 horsepower off the engine to keep it running, just a few btu's off the kerosene burner.....Yep!

Regards,

John Rodgers 88 GL Driver


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.