Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (August 2003, week 1)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sun, 3 Aug 2003 21:19:18 -0400
Reply-To:     Dennis Haynes <dhaynes@OPTONLINE.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Dennis Haynes <dhaynes@OPTONLINE.NET>
Subject:      Re: total seal ring end gap on 95mm pistons?
Comments: To: Damon Campbell <damoncampbellvw@YAHOO.COM>
In-Reply-To:  <20030803232324.52911.qmail@web13113.mail.yahoo.com>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

The only reason to have any gap at all is to make sure the rings does not bund if it expands more than the cylinder, (they do). Experienced machinist typically use the rule of ~.004" per inch of cylinder diameter. In other words, what is the Bently thinking? Typo? I have used the Total Seals and they work great. I am surprised how rarely they are mentioned on the list. They almost eliminate blow-by. That inside bevel on the top ring faces toward the crankcase unless there is also a step on the outside. If so, the step usually faces down.

Dennis

-----Original Message----- From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM] On Behalf Of Damon Campbell Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2003 7:23 PM To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM Subject: total seal ring end gap on 95mm pistons?

Hello list,

I'm currently gapping the rings on the engine i am building, and am using the non-traditional combination of total seal rings (the second ring is gapless) and the 95mm pistons.

First thing i notice is that the ring end gaps specified by bently are significantly larger than that of total seal:

upper: .035" (bentley)/ .020" (T.S.) middle: .035" (bentley)/ .013" (T.S.) oil scraper: .037" (bentley)/ .015 min. (T.S.)

Now so far, the uppers and oil scrapers seem fine per T.S. spec, but the middles, without any filing, are coming out to about 0.019". These are the somewhat funky gapless ones - how strict is this number (seems pretty strict), and what should i do about it? Also, why the difference between bentley and T.S.?

My final question is that i'm having a really hard time determining which way the bevel on the top ring goes - what is the secret method to doing this?

Thanks for any help, -Damon

===== '84 Westy (Sparky) '65 Kharma Ghia (Dharma)

__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.