Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (September 2003, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 12 Sep 2003 00:22:23 -0400
Reply-To:     Kim Brennan <kimbrennan@MAC.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Kim Brennan <kimbrennan@MAC.COM>
Subject:      Re: Manual or AT?
Comments: To: Chuck Mathis <cmathis@HOUSTON.RR.COM>
In-Reply-To:  <BB8672C5.A42%cmathis@houston.rr.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed

When the snow gets to be more than a couple of inches deep, you may find it difficult to get moving (especially uphill). A manual transmission is easy to switch between 1st and reverse...and do it in time with the natural rocking of the vehicle. All automatics I've driven there is just enough of a delay to make this extremely difficult.

In an automatic you are at the mercy of the transmission as to what gear you are in (while you can specify a LOWER gear, you can NOT specify and get a HIGHER gear). At slow speeds that means you are in 1. In a manual transmission I can start the vehicle in 2nd. That is important so that you keep the wheels moving but NOT spinning. Spinning tire(s)==no control. This is especially true on ice.

Front wheel drive vehicles have an advantage in snow, over rear drive vehicles, in that the drive wheels are also the directional wheels. In deep snow the front wheels (of rear drive vehicles) become rudders.

Nowadays you can get 4 wheel drive in an automatic. These vehicles will probably perform better...but if you get stuck, the manual transmission can allow you to rock the vehicle out of the deep stuff and get going again. The automatics I've seen, just can't do that (I have seen folks spinning front and rear wheels, though I wasn't in a position to see if it was all 4 wheels or only the 2 on the side I was on.)

Regardless, my Syncros are among the best snow vehicles I've seen. Weight (to punch through the snow), clearance (to get over the snow and not bog down in it) and, of course, the all wheel drive (and locking differentials if it gets really nasty).

When it snows in the mid-Atlantic, my automatics go in to hibernation and my Syncros get a lot of travel time.

On Thursday, September 11, 2003, at 07:43 PM, Chuck Mathis wrote:

> Please explain. > > My '85 automatic was excellent in the snow and ice in Ohio (haven't > had much > experience with that since moving to Texas). The smooth power > transfer and > forced gradual starts seems to me to be an ideal snow and ice > combination > much like the diesel Rabbit I drove in Alaska.


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.