Yes, and the major difference is that they do not propagate by email, so you _generally_ need to be directly targeted by a bad guy. The places that get hit are also almost always commercial, not private. And they usually do it to host a warez site, a nice private chat room, or as a shell site to hop to the next victim. They tend not to attract attention to the fact they did anything. I have seen systems that were cracked for over a year with no symptoms at all before discovery. Very different, indeed. tom On 25 Sep 2003 at 8:59, Don Preston wrote: > <quote>There aren't even any viruses capable of attacking a linux computer. > Woohoo! > -wes > </quote> > > This is so, so wrong. In fact, over the last year there have been more > exploits reported for Linux than WinXP or Server2k3. > > Please verify your facts before posing just obviously wrong information. > > Don Preston > '87 Wolfy GL ASI > ~Betsy the Mp3 Bus~ >
------ Tom Ring K0TAR, ex-WA2PHW EN34hx 85 Westphalia GL Albert 96 Jetta GL The Intimidator taring@taring.org "It is better to go into a turn slow, and come out fast, than to go into a turn fast and come out dead." Stirling Moss |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.