Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (October 2003, week 1)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 6 Oct 2003 13:52:54 -0400
Reply-To:     David Beierl <dbeierl@ATTGLOBAL.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         David Beierl <dbeierl@ATTGLOBAL.NET>
Subject:      Re: Bentley - Page 24.24b -- Question -- vacuum oriface(?)
Comments: To: Damon Campbell <damoncampbellvw@YAHOO.COM>
In-Reply-To:  <20031006052317.96875.qmail@web13106.mail.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

At 01:23 AM 10/6/2003, Damon Campbell wrote: >Is the point of the oriface to reduce the amount of >vacuum whatever is at the end of that hose sees? > >In a dynamic system, an oriface would be a pressure >loss (or in this case, rise), but especially with >highway driving, we should be dealing with more steady >state manifold vacuum conditions, right?

Drop <g> -- the world gets a lot simpler -- to think about if not necessarily to measure -- if we count up from zero pressure instead of up from atmospheric pressure using one (linear) unit and down using a different (proportional) one. You can see how it happened historically, but imagine what your friends would think if you suggested developing such a convention...they're coming to take me away, ha ha, they're coming to take me away, hee hee, to the funny farm where life is beautiful all the time and I'll be happy to see those nice young men in their clean white coats and they're coming to take me away...

> In which >case, the oriface would just slow the response time a >little bit... almost like acting as more of a >damper(?).

Right -- it appears to inhibit flapping of the charcoal-canister vacuum valve under changing throttle/load conditions, and/or cause the valve to operate more gently than otherwise. I suppose it might also limit leak rate if the diaphragm ruptured (instead of the tee breaking which ISTM usually happens) -- if there's any conceivable way to pull a working fuel mixture through that canister the orifice would stop any possibility of the engine running away in that case.

>Can anyone explain to me why orifii and different >sized lines are necessary for the vacuum sub-system?

Think of them as resistors -- same uses as in an electrical/electronic system. Time-constant changing, impedance buffering, catastrophic (or otherwise) rate-limiting, energy extraction and so on.

d

-- David Beierl - Providence RI USA -- http://pws.prserv.net/synergy/Vanagon/ '84 Westy "Dutiful Passage" '85 GL "Poor Relation"


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.